Sunday, May 5, 2019
Human Rights and the Ethiopian Government Essay
Human Rights and the Ethiopian Government - Essay ExampleThe current presidential term stands accused of acts that go against basic human rights and surely in no way represent the will of the Ethiopian people for freedom and democracy.The Human Rights delay website (www.hrw.org) has said that the aftermath of Ethiopias landmark May 2005 parliamentary elections has laid bare the deeply entrenched patterns of semipolitical repression, human rights abuse and impunity that characterize the day-to-day reality of governance in much of the sylvan. Although the Ethiopian elections were of great interest to a world audience who felt that the democratic process was truly at work, the truth was that political groups were literally fighting it out for a place in debates and on the right to vote boxes. The EPRF was busy coercing voters into a repeat result from the 2000 election with abusive tactics that the HRW researchers explain as presidential term officials and security force backs in much of Ethiopia making routine use of various forms of human rights abuse to deter and avenge dissent (Ibid.).These authority figures are retaining such abusive control over the Ethiopian population by citing terrorist plots and opposite security threats that will legitimately let officials detain suspects and interrogate them for purposes that actually bear no relation to actual national security. The EPRF has effectively fixed that any dissenting movement from that of their own ships company is therefore a national threat and as such they have treated members of the CUD and the join Ethiopian Democratic Forces as enemies of the state. The 2005 Amnesty International Report mentions that aside from citizen unrest within the country due to fear of torture and detainment, the government has also proposed new legislation that would put members of the press at risk of arrest for probing into what are deemed private parliamentary matters (Amnesty International Report 2005). Alth ough international observers and natural watchdogs of the Ethiopian 2005 election reported that the results were in general in consensus with actual voting percentages, CUD and other opposition members maintained that there were a high number of uncounted ballots that might have do a significant difference to government. After refusing to accept the results of what they stated was a fixed election, CUD members decided that the official course of action would be civil disobedience. Thousands participated in the plan and this led to massive force on the part of the police, something that did no favors to the poor reputation of the EPRG in terms of human rights violations. After abusing these dissenters, the government maintained its official position and yet did little to change its image for the better both across the nation and internationally. In the U.S. Department of States Country Reports on Human Rights Practices, fifteen different violations of human rights were reported in cluding outlaw(a) killings, detentions of thousands without charge, government interference in union activities, self-censorship by journalists, government infringement on citizens privacy rights and government
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.